Multi-party contracts
Each party with its own role and document list, like the facilities-use contract between an insurer, a car dealership and an agent.
In a legal department, most of the time spent on a standard contract goes into copying data from bylaws, powers of attorney and tax certificates into a Word template. orbit contracts reads those documents, proposes each value with a confidence level and lets the lawyer validate it before the contract is generated and sealed.
A three-party contract requires, for each party, its articles of incorporation, its representative's power of attorney, an ID, its tax status certificate and sometimes a regulatory letter. The lawyer opens each PDF, hunts for the deed number, the notary and the public registry filing date, and types them by hand into the Word template. A name that doesn't match between the ID and the power of attorney, or a mistyped date, surfaces late or never. And the time that should go to reviewing signing authority and risk goes to data entry.
A multitenant platform for legal departments that, starting from a configurable catalog of contract types, required documents and templates, reads each party's documents with OCR and a language model, extracts only the fields the template needs, cross-checks data between documents, puts it through lawyer validation and generates the Word contract with a digital seal.
Upload, process, validate, generate, seal and release, with the process state enforced on the server.
The lawyer picks the contract type and the platform lists the documents required for each party. They're uploaded one at a time or in bulk.
Each document is read with OCR and vision; the model extracts only that template's fields and scores each one. An unreadable document is flagged and requested again.
Values arrive with their source, confidence and cross-check warnings, such as a name that differs between the ID and the power of attorney. The lawyer corrects and validates.
The Word template is filled with dates in Mexican legal format, a SHA-256 hash is computed, a folio is issued and the contract is released.
It doesn't draft clauses or negotiate terms: it fills the template the legal department already approved. It doesn't sign: the digital seal belongs to the organization, and counterparties sign outside the platform. Cross-check warnings are shown to the lawyer, never resolved on their own. Today one contract type is configured end to end; each new type is added as catalog and template, with no development, but someone has to configure it.
What exists in the platform today.
Each party with its own role and document list, like the facilities-use contract between an insurer, a car dealership and an agent.
Deed, notary, notary office, commercial folio and public registry filing, pulled from the bylaws and the power of attorney.
A business area files the request with attachments and checks its status; the lawyer turns it into a process.
The legal admin sets up contract types, documents, fields, templates, mappings and cross-check rules.
A contract table with the full file: documents, validated data, seal and event log.
Each organization on its own subdomain, with its own branding, users and data isolated in the database.
Five differences from filling in the template by hand.
Request demoValues arrive extracted with their source; the job becomes confirming and correcting.
Cross-checks flag when a name or value doesn't match between the ID, the power of attorney and the bylaws.
Extraction is selective per contract type: nothing extra is read and no irrelevant documents are requested.
SHA-256 hash, folio, date and user are embedded in the document and in the process log.
Adding a contract means setting up catalog, template and mappings, not requesting development.
An honest comparison between the hand-filled template and the contract built from the file.
Built around an insurer's legal department. The architecture fits any legal team that issues standard contracts from corporate documents.
The proof-of-concept case: three-party contracts with notarial documents and regulatory letters.
Services, confidentiality or lease agreements, each as a contract type in the catalog.
In 30 minutes we'll tell you whether orbit contracts fits your process, what it integrates with and what it doesn't, and what a pilot looks like. If it doesn't fit, we'll tell you that too.
Run the discovery with rocky